The number of published systematic reviews has increased dramatically over the last fifteen years. Are they all good? Like any other study, a systematic review needs to be read with a critical eye. There are specific criteria for critically appraising a published systematic review. Understanding these criteria and applying them to a systematic review will give you more confidence in the conclusions you draw from a review.
For the most complete display of articles, please login.
Report from the Medical Library Association’s InSight Initiative Summit 1: Engaging Users in a Disruptive Era
Response to “Environmental scan and evaluation of best practices for online systematic review resources”
Transforming the systematic review service: a team-based model to support the educational needs of researchers
“Blacklists” and “whitelists”: a salutary warning concerning the prevalence of racist language in discussions of predatory publishing
Editor - Christine Willis, AHIP
Managing Editor - Susan Talmage
Full Editorial team - click here
MLA News is updated continually. Most articles are restricted to MLA members and/or to members of specific MLA Sections. For the most complete display of articles, please login.
Submit to the MLA News.
Products, services, and events published in the MLA News do not constitute MLA's endorsement or approval. Opinions expressed in MLA News are the authors' and do not necessarily express those of the association.
October 19, 2018
10:35 AM - 10:35 AM
San Antonio, TX
October 25, 2018
10:30 AM - 10:30 AM
October 28, 2018
04:05 PM - 04:05 PM
November 14, 2018
10:40 AM - 10:40 AM
< MLA News < Article detail
Are All Systematic Reviews Created Equal?
Released: August 10, 2016 12:35 PM | Updated: May 16, 2017 01:16 PM
If no content displays, it may be because the access to this article is member-only. Please login below, and then use the back page control to get back from the home page to the page displaying the article.