Contact Us | Donate | Advertise Follow us on TwitterFollow us on facebookFollow us on LinkedIn

MLA '19 Submissions Acceptance Rates - #mlanet19

The MLA ′19 Contributed Content Working Group thanks everyone who took the time and effort to prepare and submit abstracts for the upcoming annual meeting, as well as those who volunteered their time to review the abstracts. We could not have completed the peer review process without you!

The submissions received were of high quality, and we are confident that the programming will ELEVATE your practice and our profession. Below is a numerical summary of the submissions.

Content Type

Submitted     

Accepted     

Acceptance Rate

Papers

155

105

68%

Immersion Sessions     

36

21

58%

Lightning Talks

67

51

76%

Posters

193

173

90%

 

We are also proud to feature first-time presenters throughout the conference. Chances are, no matter what type of content you see in Chicago, you’ll come across a New Voice in the profession!

Content Type

Accepted     

New Voices (n)     

New Voices* (%)

Papers

105

27

26%

Immersion Sessions     

21

4

19%

Lightning Talks

51

15

29%

Posters

173

54

31%

* Percentages reflect the number of the first-time presenters of accepted content.

See you in Chicago!

The Contributed Content Working Group


Find all MLA ’19 Elevate blog posts here.

Recent Stories
Official Meeting Blogger: Immersion Sessions

Official Meeting Blogger: What’s New with PubMed? NLM’s PubMed Update at MLA’19

Official Meeting Blogger: A Post-Immersion Session Reflection