Resources
Librarian's Guide to a JCAHO Accreditation Survey
The purpose of this guide is to provide answers to questions that librarians
might have about the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
(JCAHO) accreditation process as it relates to libraries and information
services.
What is JCAHO?
JCAHO is the national accrediting
body for hospitals and other health care delivery organizations. Hospitals
request to have JCAHO evaluate their facility and are charged a fee. Because
accreditation is not automatically renewed, a full accreditation survey
is required at least every three years.
After two years of preparation, in 2004, JCAHO began
using a new accreditation process called "Shared Visions-New Pathways."
Beginning in 2006, all regular accreditation surveys will be conducted
on an unannounced basis. The transition to unannounced surveys will begin
with pilot tests conducted in volunteer organizations during 2004 and
2005.
What is "Shared Visions--New Pathways?"
The "Shared Vision" is that health care organizations are dedicated
to providing safe, high-quality care. JCAHO shares this vision, so it
is providing an accreditation process to support a health care organization's
quality and safety efforts.
"New Pathways" represents a new set of approaches
or pathways to the accreditation process that will support the shared
visions.
The 2004 Comprehensive Accreditation Manual for Hospitals
(CAMH) reflects the changes in the process. This includes everything from
the wording of the standards to their scoring as well as the methods of
the pre- and onsite survey.
Each standard includes a rationale for the standard and
elements of performance (EPs) that give clear expectations with little
room for interpretation. The list of scored requirements is identical
to what the surveyors use (no hidden information). To improve consistency
in the survey process, JCAHO began a certification process for surveyors
in 2002.
"Shared Visions--New Pathways" shifts the focus
from survey preparation to continuous improvement of operational systems
that directly affect the quality and safety of patient care. As described
on the JCAHO Website, the elements
of the new process are:
- Substantial consolidation of the standards to reduce
the paperwork and documentation burden of the accreditation process
and increase its focus on patient safety and health care quality
- A required mid-cycle, periodic performance review
(PPR)
- A focused on-site survey directed by the priority
focus process (PFP)
- On-site evaluation of compliance with standards relating
to the care experience of actual patients
- Revision of individual organization performance reports
to provide performance information not portrayed in the current reports
- Active engagement of physicians and other direct caregivers
in the new accreditation process
How is the onsite survey agenda developed?
The onsite survey agenda is developed from the organization's mid-cycle
PPR and the PFP.
For the PPR, the health care organization evaluates its
own compliance with applicable standards and develops a plan of action
for identified areas of non-compliance. Validation of corrections and
other randomly selected PPR findings occurs during the triennial on-site
survey.
The PFP process aggregates organization-specific information
through an automated, rules-based tool. Input information includes ORYX
core measure data, previous recommendations, demographic data related
to clinical service groups and diagnostic-related groups, complaints,
sentinel event information, and MedPar data.
Additionally, JCAHO identifies priority focus areas (PFAs)
for each hospital based on a combination of the PFP, on which surveyors
initially will focus during the initial part of the on-site survey, and
on systems and processes that are relevant to patient safety and health
care quality. For example, systems and process include such things as
assessment and care, medication management, credentialing, equipment use,
infection control, etc. Information management is one of the PFAs.
How does an organization conduct its mid-cycle periodic
performance review (PPR)?
- The organization's JCAHO team reviews the standards
and identifies areas for improvement (15-18 months cycle).
- The team creates a plan of action for each EP that
they have marked as partial or insufficient compliance.
- The team defines "measures of success,"
that is, improvement targets with audits. The surveyors will review
the measures of success and decide if the targets were met.
- The team will also conduct phone reviews with the
Standards Interpretation Group.
How will the onsite survey be conducted?
There is a new agenda for the onsite survey:
- Opening conference and orientation
- Survey planning session
- Individual tracer activity
- System tracer activity (such as medication management,
infection control, data use)
- Proficiency testing validation and regulatory review
(laboratory only)
- Special issue resolution
- Daily briefing
- Competency assessment process
- Medical staff credentialing and privileging
- Environment of care session
- Life safety code building tour
- Leadership session
- Chief executive officer exit briefing and organization
exit conference
It is estimated that 50% to 60% of the survey time will
be spent on tracer activities, where the surveyors look at how care is
being delivered, rather than on policies. For the "tracer methodology,"
the surveyors will focus on what is important as identified through the
organization's PFP. They will look at how the standards are executed as
they follow selected patients through the health care organization. The
surveyors will visit patient care settings and functional areas, guided
by randomly chosen open records that relate to the PFP information. For
example, if the PFP information includes a clinical service group for
heart failure, the survey team will trace selected patients from the critical
care unit to a medical floor and discharge and look at processes such
as assessment and medication management. During the tracer, the surveyors
will include all relevant standards.
Videos describing the new process are available on the
JCAHO
site. JCAHO regards the tracer methodology as a way to provide education
to the organization staff and leaders.
What is the scoring process?
Under the new decision process, each standard is judged either "compliant"
or "not compliant" based on the scoring of the EPs. A standard
will be "not compliant" if any of the EPs is scored 0 (insufficient
compliance) or 35% or more of its EPs are scored 1 (partial compliance).
If problems are identified, the surveyor will issue a "Requirement
for Improvement" and the organization has 90 days to submit "Evidence
of Standards Compliance" (changes to 45 days after July 1, 2005).
What elements of the "Management of Information"
chapter are critical for effective management of knowledge-based information
(KBI)?
The overview of the chapter discusses why management of information is
an essential endeavor:
- The goal of the information management function is
to support decision making to improve patient outcomes
assure patient
safety
improve performance.
- A hospital's provision of care, treatment, and services
is a complex endeavor that is highly dependent on information. This
includes information about the science of care, treatment, and services.
- Managing information is an active, planned activity.
To achieve a vision for effectively and continuously
improving information management in health care organizations, the following
are critical:
- Ensuring timely and easy access to complete information
throughout the organization.
- Accessing and using external knowledge bases
to
pursue opportunities for improvement
Standard IM.1.10 relates to information planning
- The hospital plans and designs information management
processes to meet internal and external information needs.
The rationale for this standard requires evidence of
a planned approach that "identifies the hospital's information needs
and supports its goals and objectives."
EPs for IM.1.10 state that "The hospital bases its
information management processes on a thorough analysis of internal and
external information needs." IM.1.10 outlines all of the components
of needs analysis that should be used for knowledge-based informatoin
(KBI) as well as the other standards.
Standard IM.4.10 addresses information-based decision making
- The information management system provides information
for use in decision making.
The rationale for this standard states that "Clinical
and strategic decision making depends on information from multiple sources,
including the patient record, knowledge-based information, comparative
data/information, and aggregate data/information."
What standards, rationales, and elements of performance
specifically relate to KBI?
The knowledge-based information standard is IM.5.10:
- Knowledge-based information resources are readily
available, current, and authoritative.
JCAHO defines knowledge-based information as "A
collection of stored facts, models, and information that can be used for
designing and redesigning processes and for problem solving. In the context
of this manual, knowledge-based information is found in the clinical,
scientific, and management literature."
The rationale for the standards delineates the purposes
for ready access to KBI for all hospital practitioners and staff. These
purposes include maintenance of competence, clinical and management decision
making, patient and family information, performance improvement and patient
safety, and educational and research needs.
The standard is expanded by the EP, which must be addressed
in the PPR. There are four EPs, and the scoring range for the EPs are
0, 1, 2, and NA:
- Library services are provided by cooperative or contracted
arrangements with other institutions, if not available on-site.
- The hospital provides access to information resources
needed by staff in print, electronic, Internet, audio, and/or other
appropriate form.
- Knowledge-based resources are available at all times
to clinical or service staff, through electronic means, after-hours
access to an in-house collection, or other methods.
- The hospital has a plan to provide for access to information
during times when electronic systems are unavailable.
How will the KBI standards be addressed in the PPR and
onsite survey?
The librarian should be an active participant on any management of information
planning committee or task force in the hospital. When the PPR is done,
the librarian should be involved in responding to the EPs that address
KBI throughout the standards. The librarian should point out how "library
services," which are specifically mandated in EP#1, are most effectively
and efficiently addressed by an onsite, professionally managed library.
The librarian is also the one who can select where and when certain contractual
arrangements can be effective. For example, some consortia agreements
are only made between libraries; the librarian can point out to administration
how this serves the information requirements of the hospital.
Since publication of the 2004 CAMH, there have been discussions
in the hospital library community regarding EP#4, "The hospital has
a plan to provide for access to information during times when electronic
systems are unavailable." The hospital must have backup systems for
access to all types of information, including KBI. The librarian can point
out the most effective methods for assuring KBI access when electronic
systems are unavailable. An up-to-date, organized print collection for
basic clinical and drug information, providing redundancy in case of extended
downtime, is the most basic way to address this requirement.
Because the survey team will address all of the standards
in some fashion, a hospital staff member may be asked how to get clinical
information if the computers are down. KBI may be addressed this way as
well. The surveyors will look at how the standards are executed as they
follow selected patients through the health care organization or as they
do system tracer activities.
Where else does JCAHO address KBI needs?
Throughout the 2004 CAMH, the importance of
the literature for evidence-based decision making is clearly stated:
- The "Sentinel Event" chapter states that
to be credible, a root cause analysis must include consideration
of any relevant literature.
- Standard MM.8.10: The hospital evaluates its medication
management system.
"The hospital routinely evaluates the literature for new technologies
or successful practices that have been demonstrated to enhance safety
in other organizations to determine if it can improve its own medication
management system."
- Standard IC.1.10: The hospital uses a coordinated
process to reduce the risks of nosocomial infections in patients and
health care workers. EP#1 states,"The hospital's infection control
process is based on sound epidemiologic principles and evidence-based
information on reducing nosocomial infection."
- Standard IC.4.10: The hospital takes action to prevent
or reduce the risk of nosocomial infections in patients, staff, and
those who come into the hospital. Strategies for risk reduction includes
the statement that "The strategies are consistent with current
scientific knowledge, accepted practice guidelines" (EP#2).
- Standard PI.2.10: Data are systematically aggregated
and analyzed. EP#4 states, "Data are analyzed and compared internally
over time and externally with other sources of information when available."
Examples of external sources of information include recent scientific,
clinical, and management literature.
- Standard LD.4.20: New or modified services or processes
are designed well. EP#4 states that one of the design elements is "Current
knowledge when available and relevant (for example, practice guidelines
information
from relevant literature)."
- The "Nursing" chapter overview states,
"The nurse executive also ensures the quality of nursing standards
of patient care, treatment, and services and practice by incorporating
current nursing research finding, nationally recognized professional
standards, and other literature into the policies and procedures governing
the provision of nursing care, treatment, and services."
Thus, IM.5.10 is not the only place in the CAMH that
addresses the importance of KBI in the organization. And, "survey
time" is not the only time for the librarian to note these requirements.
Throughout the year, as the librarian provides services that address these
standards, the librarian should point out the contribution of professional
library services to these activities.
The MLA standards were written to complement and further define the JCAHO
standards. For example, the JCAHO standards state that information management
should be based on the assessed needs of the users. The MLA standards
provide a suggested framework from which a needs-assessment process can
be developed. In addition to complementing JCAHO standards, the MLA standards
are a useful tool in working with hospital administration and with other
accrediting bodies.
The abstract of the MLA standards states, "The standards
define the role of the medical librarian and the links between knowledge-based
information and other functions such as patient care, patient education,
performance improvement, and education. In addition, the standards address
the development and implementation of the knowledge-based information
needs assessment and plans, the promotion and publicity of the knowledge-based
information services, and the physical space and staffing requirements."
The MLA "Standards for Hospital Libraries" is a living document
that will be added to as the health care environment changes and new challenges
present themselves.
Credits
This overview of the 2004 JCAHO accreditation process is intended to provide
some highlights of "Shared Visions--New Pathways" that may be
most useful to hospital librarians. The JCAHO
Website (available at either www.jcaho.org or www.jcaho.com) provides
additional information on the survey process and other critical activities
such as the national patient safety goals that will affect all health
care organizations. As MLA members gain experience with the new process,
changes and additions to this overview will be made. Members are encouraged
to contact the MLA member liaison to JCAHO with their ideas and comments.
Thanks to Jeannine Cyr Gluck, AHIP, and Susan Schweinsberg
Long, AHIP, for their input.
Margaret
Bandy, AHIP
MLA member liaison to JCAHO, 2003-2005
April 2004