|
June/July 2000

The Function of Consumer Health Information Centers in Hospitals
Submitted by Felicia A. Smith, Health Learning Center,
Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL
Consumer health information centers in hospitals serve an important function.
Hospitals are prime locations to optimize patient and family education,
as well as provide instantaneous access to and for clinicians.
Health information is abundant, especially on the Internet. Information
centers evaluate data for quality assurance. These centers empower
consumers with information, enabling them to make informed decisions.
Health information dissemination must be a concerted effort by all of
the disciplines involved in the continuum
of care [1]. Research indicates that effective patient education is instrumental
in decreasing the length of hospital stays [2].
Consumers are bombarded with stories of "miracle cures," which
they tend to believe. Belief systems do not have to be testable, but scientific
research does. Information centers ensure that consumers are provided
with tested, reliable information. Often, consumers use journalism Websites
that have "Health" subheadings, but these sites should really
refer users with complex questions to health information centers, which
can assist them in locating credible Websites, such as the National Institutes
of Health's site. These centers also teach methods of identifying quality
indicators such as authorship, content source, and timeliness [3].
There is a debate about the practical and ethical dilemmas concerning
distribution of consumer health information. Should libraries facilitate
access to professional literature that most consumers are not properly
equipped to comprehend and use effectively? Or should they guide consumers
away from this problematic, but accurate professional literature towards
sources designed for the lay public? Some may prefer not to contribute
to the "arrested development" of some consumers who cannot pose
an accurate request for information, because they are not well versed
in the terminology and consequently are unable to properly articulate
their requests. Information centers use resources appropriate for the
consumers' comprehension levels and spend time ascertaining exactly what
the consumers' needs are.
The process begins with basic definitions of controlled vocabularies.
Few lay people can define meta-anlaysis, review articles, double-blind,
or Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). When consumers have a grasp of the
concepts, they are empowered to continue searching independently. There
has been a 200% increase in consumer use of MEDLINE since the National
Library of Medicine made it available for the public through PubMed. A
key contributor to the consumers' independence is proper disclosure about
the information-gathering process. Pursuant to consumers' research, they
can make more educated inquiries and take an active, participatory role
in their health care.
References
1. Gaynor S, Patyk M. Putting the pieces in place: the patient education
puzzle. J Nurs Care Qual 1998 Feb;12(3):64_8.
2. Patyk M, Gaynor S, Verdin J. Patient education resource assessment:
project management. J Nurs Care Qual 2000 Jan;14(2):14_20.
3. Wu G, Li J. Comparing Web search engine performance in searching consumer
health information: evaluation and recommendations. Bull Med Libr Assoc
1999 Oct; 87(4):456-61.

Web Usability
Edited by Melissa L. Just
Submitted by Candice Benjes, Norris Medical Library,
University of Southern California_Los Angeles
Building a Website is no small accomplishment, but building a usable
Website is even more impressive. Some Web developers may label a site
"usable" if its links are working and the server it resides
on is stable. People trying to use the site may have different, more stringent
criteria. The field of usability concentrates on the latter viewpoint.
Can people find what they are looking for without getting a headache?
Do they understand the site well enough to complete their task? And, if
so, is the experience positive enough to give them a favorable impression
of the site? Or do they vow never to return?
Many different components of Web design and construction affect the usability
of the site. A page heavy with graphics may take a long time to download,
and potential users may become impatient. According to Jakob Nielsen of
useit.com, the average Web user will only wait ten seconds before giving
up and moving on to a new page. Ten seconds is not very long in modem-time.
Because some sites are designed for a specific release of a specific browser
(Internet Explorer 5.0, for example), users trying to download pages with
America Online (AOL) or Netscape, or even an earlier version of Internet
Explorer, can have difficulties.
Other times the problem lies with the architecture of the site. A common
mistake is designing a site along organizational chart lines. For example,
a library site may link interlibrary loan request forms from a heading
called Access Services on the home page. Although library staff may know
that this department handles interlibrary loans, they should not expect
users to know it.
Assuming anything about Web users does not conform to usability standards.
Instead, Web managers are encouraged to gather user feedback when planning,
building, and revising Websites. Focus groups can be a good start, but
librarians involved in Web development should also consider techniques
such as usability tests, where users are observed trying to find information
on a Website. Such activities can provide insight into users' minds and
inspire new ways of thinking about the Web. Turn to page 17 for a list
of usability Websites.
|
Name
|
URL and Description
|
| Ask Tog |
www.asktog.com
A Web magazine for computer professionals, which includes a section
on Web design.
|
| Information Architecture
Tutorial |
hotwired.lycos.com/webmonkey/;
jump to Design/Site Building and choose Information Architecture
Tutorial
A list of examples of computer interfaces that confuse the user.
|
| Usable Web |
usableweb.com
This learning module from University of Florida presents four case
studies regarding the flu. Each case study includes a multiple-choice
question-and-answer section and links to patient education information
sheets. A post-test is included for physicians interested in earning
continuing medical education (CME) credit.
|
| Usability Matters |
webreview.com;
jump to Design/Usability
A series of articles discussing Web usability and why people should
be interested.
|
| Useit.com: Usable Information
Technology |
www.useit.com
Jakob Nielsen, Web usability guru, explores a myriad of usability
issues in his Alertbox, a biweekly feature. This site is a must-see
for those interested in usability.
|
| User-Centered Iterative
Design for Digital Libraries: The Cypress Experience |
|
| User Testing: How to
Plan, Execute, and Report on a Usability Evaluation |
www.builder.com;
search for "User Testing" and click on "User Testing 101"
Step-by-step guidelines for running a usability study. |
| Web Site Usability: A
Designer's Guide, Chapter 3: Links on the World Wide Web |
|
|