MLA Position Statements and FAQs
Electronic Publishing Position Statement
Introduction
The emergence of electronic publishing models that seek to establish electronic
repositories of scientific research information offers unprecedented potential
for accessing the literature by health professionals, students, educators,
researchers, and the public. Some models, such as PubMed Central, proposed
by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), seek to establish a Web-based
repository that will archive, organize, and distribute peer-reviewed reports
from journals as well as reports that have been screened but not formally
reviewed.
The Medical Library Association supports these initiatives and the opportunities
they present for more efficient and free access to the literature. MLA
maintains that health sciences librarians must be involved in the development
of electronic publishing initiatives. Librarians have highly developed
skills, expertise, and training in the organization, collection, dissemination,
and preservation of print information. As collections of information transition
from print to electronic format, librarians will continue to play a crucial
role in the development and dissemination of these collections.
Electronic publishing initiatives, such as the Scholarly Publishing and
Academic Resources Coalition (SPARC), BioOne, and PubMed Central, have
generated widespread discussion among publishers, scholarly and scientific
societies, and librarians on a number of issues that are common to many
of the proposals that have been introduced.
Issues of Concern to Libraries
Copyright, Licensing, and Fair Use
MLA maintains that librarians serve their clients best by striving to
preserve the principles of fair use as embodied in current copyright law.
The exceptions to exclusive copyright that are provided by the fair use
doctrine are a fundamental tool in the ability of librarians to provide
access to information that supports education, research, and patient care.
Electronic publishing has the potential to make information more accessible
by empowering researchers and their institutions to hold copyright on
works. It also has the potential to eliminate fair use through the establishment
of licensing contracts that seek to restrict access to information. It
is imperative that the library community works in partnership with other
members of the academic and publishing communities to educate electronic
information users about the principles of fair use and to ensure that
developments in electronic publishing do not create barriers but open
doors to information collections.
It is equally important that librarians collaborate with the academic
and publishing communities on the development of licensing standards that
support the principles of fair use.
The Role of Professional Societies
The role of professional societies in the development of electronic
publishing is critical. Some societies view their role as an opportunity
to make the literature available more quickly and for less cost for the
user. However, in doing so, they also threaten their own financial stability
through the loss of revenues on journal subscriptions.
Peer Review
No single issue has evoked more discussion than that of peer review. Peer
review is a crucial element for the preservation of authenticity and validity
in scientific research literature and to the development of reliable information
collections.
MLA supports the need to preserve the rigor of the professional peer
review process in both research and clinical care literature. However,
MLA also recognizes the potential benefits of providing additional mechanisms
for sharing research results and discussions that have undergone a more
streamlined review process.
MLA maintains that librarians must play a crucial role in educating information
consumers, in the research, education, clinical care, consumer health,
and general public communities concerning the reliability and validity
of information distributed through less rigorously peer reviewed mechanisms.
The Role of Commercial Publishers
The Copyright Law was established to balance the rights of authors and
publishers with the needs of information users. MLA maintains that these
rights must be preserved regardless of distribution format. The importance
of maintaining this principle is also addressed in the Digital Millennium
Copyright Act and its recommendations for copyright protection and use
of digital information.
While electronic publishing offers unprecedented opportunities for improving
access to consumers of information, it also poses serious compensation
and distribution concerns for publishers and owners of information. MLA
recognizes the value of licensing agreements and the value-added services
that are provided as part of this agreement. However, the association
is concerned that these agreements also have the potential to lead to
restrictive licensing that may unnecessarily restrict access to information
consumers and hamper the ability of the library community to effectively
serve its diverse clientele.
For this reason, it is important that licensing agreements not impose
multi-site restrictions, and allow libraries to distribute information
to geographically disbursed locations. MLA believes it is imperative that
librarians work closely with the for-profit sector to establish licensing
agreements that do not create barriers to the information or eliminate
the fair use principles that are embodied in the copyright law.
Because electronic publishing has the potential to change the way the
literature is used, it will stimulate entrepreneurial activity in the
private sector. While it may create new and interesting electronic publications,
it may also limit access to federal information currently paid for by
United States citizens through their tax dollars. There is value in putting
on the public record a large body of data that might not otherwise be
available. Ethical issues surrounding federally funded projects that provide
private sector commercial opportunities and/or future control of information
previously in the public domain must be addressed.
Integration of Resources at the Institutional Level
The concept of an electronic information system to serve as a gateway
to all life sciences research literature is laudable; however, an electronic
information system that does not provide for commentary, editorials, correspondence,
and reviews is flawed. The role of librarians in facilitating access to
information that is appropriate to the particular clientele served is
fundamentally the same whether dealing with print or electronic materials.
As the field of electronic publishing evolves, MLA maintains that librarians
must continue to be the key information access facilitators, developing
institutional access policies and customized interfaces, negotiating licenses,
and effectively managing budgets.
Preservation and Archiving
In the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998, Congress recognized
the value of information preservation when it updated the Copyright Act
to permit a library or archive to reproduce up to three copies of a work
for purposes of preservation. It is imperative that librarians continue
to play a strong role in addressing the importance of preservation and
archiving in all electronic publishing models that emerge in the future.
Conclusion
Current electronic information access proposals and projects have the
potential to revolutionize the way that scientific and clinical information
is communicated. Technology brings risk. Each stakeholder in the biomedical
community - researchers, society publishers, for profit publishers, institutional
administrators, students, patients, etc. - has a key role to play in the
outcome.
Librarians have traditionally played a key role in helping to balance
these various and sometimes competing interests in service of the idea
of making sure that each constituency has access to the information that
it needs, when it needs it, and in the most easily accessible form. The
importance of collaboration among the academic community, the library
profession, and all information producers and consumers to fully understand
the strengths and weaknesses of electronic publishing schemes has never
been more important, and will assume even greater importance as technology
produces platforms that integrate image and text, sound and motion.
Authors
Prepared May 2000 by
T. Scott Plutchak, Editor, Bulletin of the Medical Library
Association, and Director, Lister Hill Library, University of Alabama,
Birmingham, AL, and
Logan Ludwig, Ph.D., Chair-designate, MLA Governmental Relations
Committee, and Associate Dean of Library Services, Loyola University Stritch
School of Medicine, and Director of Media Services, Loyola University
Health System, Maywood, IL.
For more information, contact Mary
Langman, 312.419.9094 x27.